What does the research actually show?
A new qualitative study tracked nine participants over nine months as they engaged in self-directed spiritual learning with non-directive mentoring support [1]. The researchers used multiple methods—cyclical interviews, participant journals, mentor reflections, and photovoice—to capture how spiritual growth unfolded. All nine participants reported significant spiritual transformation marked by three concrete shifts: heightened awareness of God's presence, more intentional decision-making aligned with faith, and deeper ownership of their faith journey.
This matters because it challenges the assumption that discipleship requires expert-led content delivery. Instead, the evidence suggests that when disciples shape their own learning path with a mentor asking good questions, transformation deepens.
How does heutagogy differ from traditional discipleship?
Traditional discipleship often follows a teacher-centered model: the pastor or small group leader prepares content, delivers it, and assesses whether people absorbed it. The disciple's role is largely receptive.
Heutagogy inverts this. The disciple identifies what they need to learn, sets their own pace, chooses resources, and reflects on what they're discovering. The mentor's job shifts from content expert to guide—asking clarifying questions, helping the disciple notice patterns, and creating space for reflection.
| Dimension | Traditional | Heutagogical |
|---|---|---|
| Who sets the agenda | Leader | Disciple |
| Mentor's role | Deliver and assess | Ask questions and reflect |
| Pace | Group-determined | Individual |
| Ownership | External (compliance) | Internal (agency) |
| Outcome focus | Knowledge transfer | Transformation and agency |
The research shows that when disciples own their learning, they report not just more knowledge but deeper spiritual conviction and more intentional faith-shaped decisions [1].
Why does learner agency matter for spiritual formation?
Scripture emphasizes the disciple's active role in growth. Paul writes to Timothy: "Have nothing to do with irreverent, silly myths; rather train yourself in godliness" (1 Timothy 4:7). The language is active—Timothy trains himself. Jesus told his disciples to "go and make disciples" (Matthew 28:19), not to passively receive teaching.
When a person chooses what to study, they're more likely to wrestle with it, apply it, and integrate it into their life. They're also more likely to notice where their current beliefs conflict with Scripture or where they need to change. This internal struggle—what the research calls "intentional decision-making"—is where real transformation happens.
The study found that participants who directed their own learning showed heightened God-awareness [1]. This suggests that the act of choosing what matters to you spiritually, then pursuing it, creates space for the Holy Spirit to work in ways that passive reception doesn't.
What does non-directive mentoring look like in practice?
Non-directive mentoring means the mentor resists the urge to solve problems or deliver answers. Instead, the mentor asks questions that help the disciple think more deeply.
Instead of: "Here's what Ephesians 4 means about spiritual gifts," a non-directive mentor asks: "What strikes you about that passage? Where do you see yourself in it? What would change if you believed that?"
Instead of: "You should join a small group," the mentor asks: "What's holding you back from community right now? What would community need to look like for you to want to be part of it?"
The research found that this approach, combined with self-directed learning, produced the spiritual transformation participants reported [1]. The mentor's role is to create conditions for the disciple to discover and own their faith, not to transfer the mentor's faith to them.
This is harder than content delivery. It requires the mentor to listen well, resist fixing, and trust that the Holy Spirit is at work in the disciple's own seeking. But the evidence suggests it works.
How can a church leader implement this?
Start small. Pick one disciple or one small group and experiment with heutagogical approaches.
First, invite them to set the agenda. Instead of announcing the next study, ask: "What's a spiritual question you're wrestling with right now? What do you want to understand better about your faith?" Let them name it.
Second, resist the urge to answer. When they bring a question, your instinct will be to explain. Instead, ask: "What do you think Scripture says about that? Where have you seen that play out in your own life? What would it mean if you took that seriously?"
Third, create space for reflection. The research used journals and cyclical interviews—regular check-ins where the disciple reflected on what they were learning and how it was changing them [1]. You might use a simple weekly question: "What did you notice about God this week?" or "Where did you see your faith shape a decision?"
Fourth, trust the process. The study ran for nine months. Transformation takes time. Resist the pressure to measure whether they "got it" and instead notice whether they're becoming more aware of God, more intentional in their decisions, and more owning their faith.
This approach works across denominations and theological frameworks [1], so you don't need to worry about whether it fits your tradition. It's fundamentally about helping people own their relationship with God rather than outsourcing it to a leader.
What are the limits of this research?
The study is qualitative with nine participants, so the findings are suggestive rather than definitive [1]. The researchers didn't compare heutagogical approaches to traditional discipleship in a controlled way, so we can't say with certainty that this method produces more transformation than other approaches. The study also doesn't tell us whether these results hold for different ages, cultures, or church contexts, though the researchers note the approach worked across theological frameworks.
What we can say is that nine people who engaged in self-directed learning with non-directive mentoring reported significant spiritual transformation. That's worth paying attention to, especially if your current discipleship approach feels like it's producing compliance rather than conviction.
Sources
- Esa Hukkinen, Johannes M. Luetz, Tony Dowden (2026). Heutagogy and Christian discipleship: An empirical study of spiritual growth. British Journal of Religious Education.
- Siqi Liu, Yunxi Zhang, Young‐Eun Noh (2026). Cross-Cultural Translation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Volunteer Motivations Scale for International Sporting Events. SAGE Open.
- Francesco Tommasi, Daiana Colledani, Sandro Stanzani (2026). The adapted version of the volunteer function inventory to assess the community perspective of volunteer motivation. Discover Psychology.
- Hsiao-Chung Wang, Peiju Yang (2026). Continuing the self: Role reconfiguration and life extension — Identity maintenance and generativity through volunteering. Educational Gerontology.
- Mai Buaban, Kridnawin Tongsongsom (2026). Task Significance and Prosocial Behavior among Rescue Volunteers: The Mediating Role of Pressure-Based Prosocial Motivation. The Journal of Behavioral Science.
- Supriadi Oet, Romauli Rinawati Hutabarat, Samueli Hia (2026). The Duties and Responsibilities of Christian Spiritual Mentors Regarding the Faith Growth of Contemporary Adolescents. Assoeltan Indonesian Journal of Community Research and Engagement.
- Selvi Mardalena, Agus Surya (2026). Authentic Leadership as a Call of Faith: An Analysis of the Role of Female Congregation Leaders in Church Ministry and Congregational Faith Education. International Journal of Education Vocational and Social Science.
- Lana Reid (2026). Faith, Entrepreneurship, and Overcoming Adversity: An Interview with Da' Juan Moore. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).